Skip to main content

Teardown of FlowBio



Wearables are on the rise currently, when writing this blog, Google recently released its Fitbit Air, rivaling the Whoop. However, most wearables has been until now been measuring essentially the same biomarkers, skin temperature and heart rate. Companies usually compensate for the lack of direct physiological measurements by adding and accelerometer and generating a lot of data, then throwing that to an AI model to predict a all sort of conditions about us. It works, to some extent, but at some point you would need to add a new biomarker to extract more about the human body. Sweat contains loads of information about the human body, the most obvious are electrolytes, but it also contain some metabolites such as lactate and glucose. It also contains traces hormones like cortisol, which is how dogs sense stress signals in humans. It also contains proteins, dead cells, leftover sunscreen, dust, you name it. What makes sweat interesting also make it hard to extract information from. Using ion-specific electrodes or measuring metabolites has been successfully achieved in academia, but it is expensive and prone to fouling, making their lifespan quite short.


Here comes FlowBio, which admittedly I have but haven't used because it requires yet another device to work such as a Garmin to accurately estimate the fluid loss percentage. FlowBio, along with the other competitor hDrop, are the biggest names for reusable sweat monitoring systems in the market. It measure sweat's conductivity, which is proportional to sodium and chloride ions.


Hardware teardown

Figure 1: PCB top

 

Figure 2: PCB back

The "brain" in here is a Nordic ISP1807, quite an efficient module based on nRF52840 (figure 1). However, it seems like most of the heavy lifting is being done by AD5941, which does the current and voltage impedance measurements of sweat. The system is powered by a LIR1245, having a capacity of around 55 mAh, according to Flowbio, it is capable of operating for 100 hours.



Figure 3: Back case

Figure 4: Back case with cover



What differentiates FlowBio from the competition is what they named "advanced microfluidic technology". It is a rather simple system and it seems to be effective, a double-sided tape acts as the hydrophobic boundary with cutouts to channel the fluid (figure 3), it has both an inlet and an outlet. They do recommend flushing the channel every now and then.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PromAssist, synthetic biologists assistant

In previous posts , I briefly introduced the world of synthetic biology and designing of genetic circuits. The goal of competition such as iGEM is to encourage people designing creative solutions to real-world problems using synthetic biology with the hope of moving the field out of academia into industry, much like electronics. And much like electronics, iGEM is trying to develop a library of biological parts, analogous to electronic parts such as capacitors and resistors to build any circuit. If you have ever dabbled in electronics, you'd notice that not parts are created equally; Some capacitors have higher efficiencies than others which might suit a certain application more. In this post, I want to explore one of the most important "biological parts" in my opinion:   What are promoters Promoters are regions of DNA usually found upstream of a gene that act as a switch to express whatever gene is downstream of it. Since translating DNA to mRNA requires the help of RNA ...

Butlerian Jihad: The crusade against AI and hidden tech

Image 1: Mdjourney generated picture using the prompt: "cartoon of human soldiers fighting a small robot. it shows the defeated robot in the middle and human soldiers aiming their rifles at the robot" "We must negate the machines-that-think. Humans must set their own guidelines. This is not something machines can do. Reasoning depends upon programming, not on hardware, and we are the ultimate program! Our Jihad is a "dump program." We dump the things which destroy us as humans!" ' ― Minister-companion of the Jihad. [6] That quote will be recognizable if you have read Dune by Frank Herbert . I found it suitable to bring the novel up during the extreme mixture of excitement and fear among people given the recent advance in artificial intelligence. Even an open letter was signed by many extremely influential people to halt the progress of artificial intelligence research to avoid a situation like in the cartoon above in image 1 (which is ironically AI ...

Engineered Patterns in Biology I: Intro to Turing Pattern Formation

What is this post about? This post will cover an overview of pattern formation, specifically Turing pattern formation in a non-mathematical way. The whole point here is to appreciate the beauty of what can Turing's reaction-diffusion model describe. If you are excited enough about the topic and want to cover some technicalities, a subsequent post will cover my Master's thesis work on the design of genetic circuits from first principles that makes use of Turing's reaction-diffusion model. Pattern formation in Biology It is best to start by explaining pattern formation in biology. The easiest and most obvious way to see patterns is within animals. Zebras; fish; cheetahs are some of the few animal examples that exhibit pigment patterns on their skin [1]. If you accept the fact that pigments are no more than proteins expressed within a group of cells [2], one can reasonably ask the question: How can cells determine their relative position to other cells so they end up ex...